Title Alternative Successful laparoscopic resection of a cecal tumor in a 95-year-old man
FullText URL 127_117.pdf
Author Watanabe, Ayako| Inada, Ryo| Nagasaka, Takeshi| Yagi, Tomohiko| Matsumoto, Hijiri| Toshima, Toshiaki| Kikuchi, Satoru| Kuroda, Shinshi| Kondo, Yoshitaka| Mori, Yoshiko| Kishimoto, Hiroyuki| Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi|
Abstract We report a successful laparoscopic resection of a cecal tumor in a 95-year-old Japanese man. The patient visited an initial hospital with a complaint of constipation in March 2014. Computed tomography scan and colonoscopy showed a stenotic ileocecal cancer with pericolic lymph node metastases, and he was referred to our department for management. Since his general condition was maintained, we performed a laparoscopic ileocecal resection with regional lymph node dissection for the patient. The operation achieved curative resection, and the tumor was diagnosed as a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma and graded as pStage IIIa (pT3, pN0, pM0) according to the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma, eighth edition. He was discharged on the 11th postoperative day without perioperative complications. Several large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) revealed that laparoscopic surgeries for colorectal cancers have some advantages compared to open surgeries, including superior short-term outcomes and comparable long-term outcomes. Unfortunately, since these RCTs did not include enough elderly patients, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for extremely elderly patients are still unknown. With respect to less-invasive procedures, these advantages of laparoscopic surgery are also thought to be the advantages for elderly colorectal cancer patients.
Keywords 超高齢者(extremely elderly patient) 大腸癌(colorectal cancer) 腹腔鏡手術(laparoscopic surgery)
Note 症例報告(Case Reports)
Publication Title 岡山医学会雑誌
Published Date 2015-08-03
Volume volume127
Issue issue2
Publisher 岡山医学会
Publisher Alternative Okayama Medical Association
Start Page 117
End Page 121
ISSN 0030-1558
NCID AN00032489
Content Type Journal Article
Related Url isVersionOf https://doi.org/10.4044/joma.127.117
language 日本語
Copyright Holders Copyright (c) 2015 岡山医学会
File Version publisher
Refereed True
DOI 10.4044/joma.127.117
NAID 130005096253
Sort Key 7
Eprints Journal Name joma
References 1) 大腸癌治療ガイドライン 医師用 2014年版, 大腸癌研究会編, 金原出版, 東京(2014). 2) Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group : Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg (2007) 246, 655-662. 3) Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ : Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer : long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol (2009) 10, 44-52. 4) Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ : Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg (2010) 97, 1638-1645. 5) Kitano S, Inomata M, Sato A, Yoshimura K, Moriya Y, Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study : Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer : Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol (2005) 35, 475-477. 6) Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q, Sanchez A, Frutos MD, Parrilla P : Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg (2009) 96, 982-989. 7) 永坂岳司, 稲田 涼, 藤原俊義 : 腸管損傷の修復法 : OGS NOW16合併症対策&知っておきたい他科の手術手技, メジカルビュー社, 東京(2013)pp74-81. 8) 大腸癌取り扱い規約 第8版, 大腸癌研究会編, 金原出版, 東京(2013). 9) 小澤平太, 固武健二郎 : 我が国の大腸癌 最新の基本統計(2) ―大腸癌全国登録1974~1999年症例のデータから―. 大腸癌Frontier(2010)3, 293-297. 10) Grailey K, Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Aboud R, Ziprin P, Faiz O : Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population. Surg Endosc (2013) 27, 19-30. 11) 藤井正一, 石部敦士, 大田貢由, 渡辺一輝, 渡邉 純, 辰巳健志, 山岸 茂, 市川靖史, 大木繁男, 國崎主税, 嶋田 紘, 遠藤 格 : 高齢者(80歳以上)大腸癌に対する手術成績の検討. 日本大腸肛門病会誌(2013)66, 221-228. 12) 須藤 剛, 佐藤敏彦 : 高齢者大腸癌患者における腹腔鏡補助下手術の検討. 日老医誌(2011)48, 665-671. 13) Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, et al. : The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications : five-year experience. Ann Surg (2009) 96, 187-196.
Author Inada, Ryo|
Published Date 2015-06-30
Publication Title
Content Type Thesis or Dissertation
Author Inada, Ryo| Nagasaka, Takeshi| Takehara, Kiyoto| Sugihara, Masahiro| Mori, Yoshiko| Umeda, Yuzo| Kubota, Nobuhito| Morikawa, Tatsuya| Kondo, Yoshitaka| Uno, Futoshi| Sadamori, Yu| Yagi, Takahito| Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi|
Published Date 2013-04-01
Publication Title 岡山医学会雑誌
Volume volume125
Issue issue1
Content Type Journal Article
Author Inada, Ryo| Nagasaka, Takeshi| Mori, Yoshiko| Umeda, Yuzo| Kubota, Nobuhito| Morikawa, Tatsuya| Kondo, Yoshitaka| Uno, Futoshi| Sadamori, Yu| Yagi, Takahito| Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi|
Published Date 2013-04-01
Publication Title 岡山医学会雑誌
Volume volume125
Issue issue1
Content Type Journal Article