JaLCDOI 10.18926/AMO/56937
フルテキストURL 73_4_349.pdf
著者 Isozaki, Hiroshi| Yamamoto, Yasuhisa| Murakami, Shigeki| Matsumoto, Sasau| Takama, Takehiro|
抄録 To clarify the surgical outcomes of breast cancer patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by core needle biopsy (CNB) (abbreviated as CNBDCIS), we retrospectively analyzed the cases of 131 patients with CNBDCIS who underwent surgery at Oomoto Hospital (32 total mastectomies, 99 conservative mastectomies). Our analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer of CNBDCIS revealed that the underestimation rate of CNBDCIS was 40.5% (53/131). A logistic regression analysis revealed that palpable tumors (yes to no, odds ratio [OR] 3.25), mammography (MMG) category group (category 4 or 5 to categories 1 , 2, or 3, OR 4.69) and MMG microcalcifications (no to yes, OR 0.24) were significant predictive factors for CNBDCIS invasion. In our analysis of the predictors of positive margins during CNBDCIS surgery, 36 (27.5%) of the 131 patients had positive margins after postoperative pathological examination. A logistic regression analysis revealed that the operative procedure (conservative surgery to total mastectomy, OR 21.4) and MMG microcalcifications (yes to no, OR 3.35) were significant factors related to positive margins during CNBDCIS surgery. Thus, MMG microcalcifications are a negative predictor of upgrading of CNBDCIS and a positive predictor of positive surgical margins for CNBDCIS.
キーワード ductal carcinoma in situ core needle biopsy underestimation positive margins microcalcifications on mammography
Amo Type Original Article
発行日 2019-08
出版物タイトル Acta Medica Okayama
73巻
4号
出版者 Okayama University Medical School
開始ページ 349
終了ページ 356
ISSN 0386-300X
NCID AA00508441
資料タイプ 学術雑誌論文
言語 English
著作権者 CopyrightⒸ 2019 by Okayama University Medical School
論文のバージョン publisher
査読 有り
PubMed ID 31439958
JaLCDOI 10.18926/AMO/54191
フルテキストURL 70_2_119.pdf
著者 Isozaki, Hiroshi| Matsumoto, Sasau| Murakami, Shigeki| Takama, Takehiro| Sho, Tatuo| Ishihara, Kiyohiro| Sakai, Kunihiko| Takeda, Masanori| Nakada, Koji| Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi|
抄録 Using the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45, we compared the surgical outcomes and the quality of life (QOL) between patients undergoing limited gastrectomies and those undergoing conventional gastrectomies. In Oomoto Hospital between January 2004 and December 2013, a total of 124 patients who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled. Using the main outcome measures of PGSAS-45, we compared 4 types of limited gastrectomy procedures (1/2 distal gastrectomy [1/2DG] in 21 patients; pylorus-preserving gastrectomy [PPG] in 15 patients; segmental gastrectomy [SG] in 26 patients; and local resection [LR] in 13 patients) with conventional gastrectomy (total gastrectomy [TG] in 24 patients and 2/3 or more distal gastrectomy [WDG] in 25 patients). The TG group showed the worst QOL in almost all items of the main outcome measures. The 1/2DG, PPG, and SG groups showed better QOL than the WDG group in many of the main outcome measures, including the body weight ratio, total symptom score, ingested amount of food per meal, and the dissatisfaction for daily life subscale. The LR group showed a better intake of food than the 1/2DG, PPG, and SG groups. The body weight ratio of the LR group was better than that of the SG group. Diminished gastric resection preserved better QOL in patients with early gastric cancer.
キーワード limited gastrectomy early gastric cancer function preserving gastrectomy quality of life postgastrectomy syndrome
Amo Type Original Article
発行日 2016-04
出版物タイトル Acta Medica Okayama
70巻
2号
出版者 Okayama University Medical School
開始ページ 119
終了ページ 130
ISSN 0386-300X
NCID AA00508441
資料タイプ 学術雑誌論文
言語 English
著作権者 CopyrightⒸ 2016 by Okayama University Medical School
論文のバージョン publisher
査読 有り
PubMed ID 27094837
Web of Sience KeyUT 000377626300007